About Me

Name: The Prof
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

California Teachers Pension - Demanding More From The Taxpayers

"Still staring down a $20.3 billion shortfall, the board of the California teachers' retirement fund is packing up its lesson plan and heading to the Capitol to educate a large class of new lawmakers about a plan to wipe out the long-term deficit."

Gilbert Chan, Sacramento Bee, reported on December 8 - CalSTRS set for lobbying; Its goal: Make a case in Capitol for plan to erase its long-term pension deficit.

With pension plans in California significantly under-funded, this story should be a wakeup call for the Legislature. A little social tinkering here and a little political payback there and you end up with a system that is out of control.

So what is CalSTRS plan?

We need a thorough education of every interested party. I don't think we have done that yet," said Trustee Gary Lynes. "The taxpayers will also weigh in."

Education? Taxpayers? Right!

The Legislature knows the issue. The taxpayers will be told and not educated that more of their taxes will be spent to support the California Teachers Union.

CalSTRS “education” is so simplistic. 1% here, a half-percent there, and a cap over there. Where is the plan to cut the costs? Where is the plan to stop the social engineering of business by virtue of investment? CalSTRS and CalPERS loses money and the public is told they have to pay for the folly of social experimentation in the investment markets.

You would think that this would be enough. Nope

“At the same time, CalSTRS is exploring a new health care program. Unlike state and local government workers, most retired teachers have no employer-paid medical insurance plan. CalSTRS is studying a health program that would be funded by surplus pension money. Some trustees say that move could jeopardize the pension bill.”

When you hear it is about “education” you can know think “money out of your pocket” that won’t increase one test score one point.

Read Ca Political News on this issue.

Read Like Enron? You Will Love CalSTRS

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Socialist California

From Flyatnight

The Belmont City Council voted unanimously last night to pursue a strict law that will prohibit smoking anywhere in the city except for single-family detached residences. Smoking on the street, in a park and even in one’s car will become illegal and police would have the option of handing out tickets if they catch someone.

God save the "Nanny State"
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It is "TIME" to Redeploy Our Troops from Germany

 

Michelle Malkin - Before you go ballistic on Germany - gives her take on the Time magazine report that a lawsuit will be filed in Germany seeking to charge former SecDef Rumsfeld with war crimes.

"Calls to close our bases in Germany over this hyped news story are, with all due respect, silly."

I agree with that statement.

However, Michelle needs to look at the issue of leaving our troops in Germany. The strategic value of Germany has diminished and the government is not an ally of America.

I wonder if Michelle remembers the Beider-Meinhof Gang and the terror that they created in the 1970’s? Germany is ripe for more home-grown terrorism. While we are talking about taking our troops out of harms way we should consider Germany as another one of those places that are unsafe.

I don’t think that we should be in the business of propping up socialist governments through military spending programs. Besides, the old Eastern Europe is more strategic today than is Germany. It is time to redeploy those troops.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CalPERS - Running Wild

 

CalPERS (California Public Employees' Retirement System) has spent the last few years telling corporations how they should govern. They demand transparency.

LA Times headline today, CalPERS Invokes State Law to Keep Dealings With Venture Capital Firms Secret

"The author of the 2004 law, state Sen. Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto), says it was never supposed to be used in such a way.

"I'm disappointed," said Simitian, who explained that his measure (SB 439) was intended to protect venture capitalists doing business with the state from having to disclose trade secrets and other sensitive information to competitors.

"It was not designed to give [pension funds] carte blanche to withhold documents that might be embarrassing," he said."

CalPERS ignores the author of the bill they cite and refuse to hand over material for public oversight of their activities.

There is more. Today’s Sacramento Bee has CalPERS considers a volatile expansion

"In recent years, investors have flocked to the risky commodities markets and reaped lucrative returns. Now the California Public Employees' Retirement System is poised to join in.

The run-up in the commodities market has been fueled by rising oil prices and the industrial demand for raw materials in emerging countries such as China and India."

No doubt CalPERS has been influenced by Hillary’s great returns in commodities. Is this a good idea?

"But as trustees hear today from a panel of U.S. and international experts, some strategists wonder whether the five-year commodities bull market has run its course. After four years of increases, the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index has dropped 5.1 percent this year."

Is CalPERS going to sell commodities short?

We must remember that CalPERS, the great investors, were hit hard during the tech bubble. Now we, the public, are paying for their folly. Will we be asked to bail them out again?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Lieberman For America

Joe Lieberman's "loss" in the Connecticut primary election was a win for America.

MICHAEL BARONE writes in the Opinion Journal -
Primary Colors

Connecticut, where most major-party nominations are decided by party conventions, has a tradition of low participation in primaries, and less than one-sixth of the registered voters took the trouble to cast their ballots in this contest. The winner, Ned Lamont, thus got the votes of less than one-tenth of Connecticut voters.


In fact, 67% of the voters in Connecticut have yet to chime in on the issues.

The "win" for the ultra-liberals may turn out to be the undoing of the neo-Democrat party.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »